<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rhodia Pads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.penciltalk.org/2005/11/rhodia-pads/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.penciltalk.org/2005/11/rhodia-pads</link>
	<description>exploring the art and science of pencils since 2005</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Review of Rhodia Dot Pad. &#187; Pencil Revolution</title>
		<link>http://www.penciltalk.org/2005/11/rhodia-pads/comment-page-1#comment-74514</link>
		<dc:creator>Review of Rhodia Dot Pad. &#187; Pencil Revolution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 04:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://173.203.81.145/?p=3#comment-74514</guid>
		<description>[...] who love fountain pens, the pads are also excellent for graphite. (It&#8217;s no accident that the first post on Pencil Talk was about Rhodia pads.)  Smearability on Rhodia paper has never been a problem for me at all.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] who love fountain pens, the pads are also excellent for graphite. (It&#8217;s no accident that the first post on Pencil Talk was about Rhodia pads.)  Smearability on Rhodia paper has never been a problem for me at all.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

